by
Pastor Dan Baumgartner
The clank of iron. The smell of sweat. I was lifting weights
at the gym, just about done with my first set. I strained
against the machine and closed my eyes to push and pull
with more concentration. I opened them again halfway through
my reps, and my pupils slowly focused on a friend’s
face who had slipped silently into my line of vision. I
kept lifting.
“While you do that,” he said, “I wanted
to ask you a question.”
Five more, four more, three more. “Sure, what’s
u-p-p?”
Two more, one more. “I wanted
to know what you thought of The
Da Vinci Code?” Clank. Good Lord.
The Da Vinci Code, the bestselling novel by Dan
Brown, has sold over 60 million copies since it came out
in 2003, and has been translated into 44 languages. When
I was last at Barnes and Noble there was an entire table
full of The Da Vinci Code:
- paperbacks,
- hardcovers,
- large
print editions,
- illustrated versions and
- a small group
study guide rendition.
To my chagrin, the table was parked
squarely in front of the “Religion” section.
Talk about your non-sequitor; “fiction” never
described a book so well. And now, of course, the movie
with Tom Hanks is out in theaters and grossed over $224
million in the first weekend. Video rentals will follow,
and Dan Brown is set for life.
I doubt if I’ll see the movie. Sorry. I did read
the book a couple years ago. At the risk of coming across
as a literary snob, I confess I only like good writing.
The Da Vinci Code is a B- or C+ book at best, so it doesn’t
make my heart beat faster to think of seeing the story
splayed across the big screen.
Ironically, I think the Christian community is mainly
responsible for the media feeding frenzy around The
Da Vinci Code. There are now 40 – forty! – books in print
which have been published for the sole purpose of refuting
The Code. Forty! Some of them claim that the book has 467
errors of fact in it…did I mention “fiction”?
I haven’t gone back through to count the errors. I
do get daily emails for seminars on “how to decode
The Code.”
I just don’t see it. Usually I’m the one interested
in anything that engages our culture on the topic of faith,
but this time I’m more puzzled than intrigued. I
have little interest in hearing more about
- the subversive
symbolism of Leonardo Da Vinci’s art (it’s
not there),
- the inner workings of the Opus Dei secret society
(I thought it was a secret?),
- the sacred sex rites of pagan
Christians or
- the explicit sexual nature of church architecture
(oh, please).
I am, however, interested in the comments
of Christian people who say “The
Da Vinci Code has
really shaken my faith!” Faith in what? Just because
someone figures out a way to get error-ridden, bad fiction
published (therein lies the real genius of Dan Brown) does
not make it true. I could write a book on “How to
Build a Bridge,” but that doesn’t mean you
should drive across it.
The most common questions that Da Vinci seems to elicit
for Christians are around the origins of the Bible. For
the record, let me make just three sample comments:
- The idea that thousands of documents
existed in antiquity which depicted the humanity of Jesus, and that they were
purposefully destroyed in favor of those
highlighting his divinity is not true. There were in
fact a couple dozen “gnostic” documents which
did not make it into the Bible, and these actually painted
Jesus more as a kind of divine superman. Matthew, Mark,
Luke and John show Jesus as far more human than most
of the documents rejected for the scriptures.
- The idea
that the emperor Constantine put the Bible together
is equally unsupportable. The Christian scriptures were
almost totally set (within a book or two) by 190 AD,
and very nearly identical to what we have today by 250
AD. Constantine did convene a key church council of pastors
and scholars in 325 AD, but by all historical documents
he had nothing to do with the content of the meeting.
- The idea that Constantine destroyed
key gospels in
order to create his own version of the Bible, and that
some of these were “rediscovered” amongst
the Dead Sea Scrolls in the 1950’s is ludicrous.
The Qumran library was indeed a hugely important archaeological
and biblical find. But out of 800 manuscripts found near
the Dead Sea, 200 have pieces of the Old Testament. None contain
New Testament texts, or mention Jesus, or John the Baptist,
or Christians.
I could go on and on, but I think
you get the point. If there is anything good that comes
out of all this clamor over a very fictitious book, it
may be that we are moved to consider again how it is that
God has given scripture to us, and how He speaks through
it.
But on the whole, I’m afraid that the Christian community
is once again simply majoring in the minors. Something
comes along (Mel Gibson’s Passion movie, The
Da Vinci Code) and the media stirs it and we all get worked
up and jump in with both feet. We write books, we refute,
we write Briefs columns (!) until the next thing to come
along restarts the Christian consumer feeding frenzy.
We are nearly desperate to be culturally relevant.
I worry that what gets lost along the way is the solid,
faithful, Biblical living out of our walk with Jesus.
I worry that we get too caught up to simply respond to
Jesus who said, “Come, follow me.”
That’s
the gospel according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John…not
The Da Vinci Code.
|
|
On
The Da Vinci Code: Just because someone figures
out a way to get error-ridden, bad fiction published
(therein lies the real genius of Dan Brown) does
not make it true.
|
|
|