|
The Cross
May 2002
Bethany Briefs
Pastor Dan Baumgartner
You
and I have both experienced it: The “I-Never-Noticed-That-Before” Syndrome.
Once something gets your attention, it pops up everywhere.
I remember the
last time we bought a car. We were looking at older Volvos.
Suddenly, I couldn’t drive down the street without
seeing an old Volvo. Go to a Husky game? The parking lot
was filled with old Volvos. Picture on the front of the
newspaper? Old Volvo in the background. Crossing the street?
Nearly run over by an old Volvo. Everywhere.
Over the Lent and Easter season, the
Syndrome hit me when I started preparing a class on “The
Cross of Christ.” Suddenly I saw crosses everywhere.
Jewelry, tattoos, bumper stickers, books, buildings. I looked
in the mirror and remembered that I wear a cross around my
own neck. I hadn’t noticed it or thought about it for
quite awhile. Suddenly I did.
Since the second century, the cross
has been the defining symbol of people who have faith in
Jesus Christ. The first century church seems to have used
slightly more clandestine symbols, perhaps to avoid persecution
or attention.
Pictures of doves or palms were used
extensively in Christian circles. Images of boats (Noah’s)
and lions (Daniel’s) proliferated for awhile. The “Christian
fish” that you see on automobiles today was popular
as well, using the Greek word “Icthus” (fish)
because its letters were the acronym for “Jesus Christ,
Son of God, Savior.” Before long, though, the cross
became the predominate symbol of Christian faith.
Isn’t it interesting that a Roman
method for shamefully and publicly executing serious criminals
would become the major sign of identity for Christians?
Not a sign of power, but weakness.
Not an image of life, but death. Not a commemoration of Jesus’ birth
or teaching or service or miracles, but his humiliating execution.
To those outside of the faith, it is a great puzzle. Surely
Paul was right in saying “For the message about the
cross is foolishness to those who are perishing.” The
cross is radically antithetical to all that the world values
as important.
Yet it is undeniable.
The cross literally dominates the New Testament. It stands
at the center of the Christian faith, and encompasses all
we believe. It encompasses human sin (the Messiah’s
condemnation), God’s willingness to enter human history
(the incarnation), God’s intense love for us (even
unto death) and desire to restore relationship (atonement).
Jurgen Multmann’s book title is provokingly descriptive: “The
Crucified God.”
Certainly, there is great mystery in
the cross. As the Presbyterian Confession of 1967 details,
the images of atonement in scripture are many:
- the sacrifice of a lamb
- a shepherd’s life given for
sheep
- the atonement by a priest
- the ransom of a slave
- the payment of death
- the satisfaction of a legal penalty
- a victory over the powers of evil
All of the images picture the reconciliation
of people hopelessly estranged from God. Exactly how this
happens is part of the mystery. But that it happened
on the cross is undeniable. Stephen Neill says that the cross
of Christ, for the Christian, “is the central point
of history. Here all the roads of the past converge; hence
all the roads of the future diverge.”
Perhaps all of this strikes you as
redundant for a Christian. Why am I writing about it in the Briefs?
I guess I wanted to invigorate the “Syndrome” for
you. The cross must not be taken for granted. Yet it is a
very real danger in our self-described “postmodern” era.
John Shelby Spong is a retired Episcopal
priest who has written many bestselling books on faith. Perhaps
the most popular is “Why Christianity Must Change
or Die.” Here is an excerpt:
“The view of the cross
as a sacrifice for the sins of the world is a barbarian
idea based on primitive concepts of God that must be
dismissed.”
Unfortunately, I believe that Spong’s
views are that of a modern day heretic. (He also dismisses
things like the presence of God in the world, original sin,
the resurrection and the authenticity of scripture.)
Spong is by no
means alone. I regularly have people ask me about
him and many others who write and teach about a faith without
the cross. Usually these theologies are connected to a
view of God which is very impersonal. Almost always, human
sin is thrown out along with the cross. If there is no
problem, then there’s no need for a solution.
All of this is articulated in Richard
Niehbuhr’s critique of a prevailing theology in America:
“A God without wrath brought
people without sin into a kingdom without judgment through
the ministrations of a Christ without a cross.”
Niehbuhr wrote these words in 1959,
but it seems to fit even better in 2002.
The cross of Christ is not a piece
of the Christian message, it encompasses the Christian message.
When we want to understand God’s compassion, his unmerited
grace, his love towards us, his willingness to sacrifice
for our sake . . . we look at the cross. I Peter 2 combines
all of these things nicely:
“He himself bore our sins
on the cross, so that, free from sins, we might live
for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed.”
The cross sets us free from sin,
and frees us to live.
I once had a professor who only slightly
facetiously said it would be good if all Christians wore
a little cross around their neck, “but preferably
one angular, not smooth, so it constantly pricks you and
reminds you.”
I need the reminder. I’m hoping
this week that you’ll notice the crosses which, thanks
be to God, are still fairly prevalent in the American landscape.
I’m hoping the Syndrome works. I’m praying that
each cross you see will remind you not of the church, bicep
or car that they appear on, but of where your truest identity
comes from. The cross of Christ shouts out “You
are beloved of God!”
Teaching
Examples
Sermon
Archives
Current Series
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
|